Thursday, 17 June 2010
Worrying Socialistic Tendencies
Thursday, 10 June 2010
David Miliband for Next Labour Leader?
Diane Abbott after the capitulation of McDonnell is the obvious candidate for the left of the party, but less obviously Ed Miliband has also begun shifting tetchily to the left with his somewhat belated rejection of the Invasion of Iraq and implementation of a return to and an embracing of traditional values within the party. This immediately raises the point did David Miliband endorse Abbotts candidacy so as to split the left vote, against his own brother!? Somewhat extreme as this may appear, this was certainly a very un-Blair like move. Tom Clark from the Guardian commented that this position would never have existed under Blair who famously moved to stop “Red Ken”. What’s immediately clear in my eyes is that David Miliband is playing a long game strategy, that is most un Blairite like, whether it is through a sense of fairness, the necessity of having a women as a candidate or an overwhelming desire to be leader at all costs (whether that cost be his brother or not) I am not sure only this summer can tell.
As a post note its worth mentioning I think that no leader of the opposition elected immediately after an election defeat has ever made it to Prime Minister in the post war period, an ominous omen if ever I saw one!
Thursday, 29 April 2010
This weeks key issue
Tuesday, 27 April 2010
Is it time to accept the Liberal Democrats as a credible political player?
Friday, 23 April 2010
These X-Factor Style Debate Results are Worryinlgy Influential
Populus - Clegg won
Clegg: 36%
Cameron: 27%
Brown: 27%
Guardian/ICM - Clegg won
Clegg: 33%
Cameron: 29%
Brown: 29%
ITV/ComRes - Clegg won
Clegg: 33%
Brown: 30%
Cameron: 30%
Angus Reid - Clegg won
Clegg: 35%
Cameron: 33%
Brown: 23%
YouGov - Cameron won
Cameron: 36%
Clegg: 32%
Brown: 29%
Overwhelmingly these results point to a win for Nick Clegg, in the second debate. However the fact that people are being polled on who won the debate, translates for many people as "I would vote for Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats at the General Election". In reality however the only place where the poll results should hold any credence is Sheffield Hallam Nick Clegg's constituency.
This series of debates is presidential both in form and in how the results are published, encouraging people to debate the three leaders personal qualities and speaking ability, rather than the policies of the prospective parties. People after watching this debate will go out on May 6th and vote for Cleggs skill as a speaker or Cameron's dissecting of Labours policies rather than their local Liberal Democrat, Conservative or Labour MP and how they can aid them personally within their constituency.
If come May the Liberal Democrats obtain some position within Whitehall, voters are going to wish they had supported plans to sack MPs, as potentially a fair number of below-par Liberal Democrat candidates may obtain seats on the back of their leaders speaking ability.
I don't mean to detract from instant polling which is brilliantly innovative, however I believe it confirms the political ignorance of much of the electorate who maybe happy to vote without truly understanding party policies far more than it predicts a potential electoral winner.